This is part of my "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" blog challenge.
Arthur Schoennauer - My Maternal Grandfather
Vital Facts
When Arthur Charles John Schoennauer was born on October 5, 1875, in Chicago, Illinois, his father, John Schoennauer, an injured Civil War veteran, was 36 and his mother, Amalia Wilhelmina Schlichting, an immigrant from Prussia, was also 36. Arthur was married three times during his life and had three sons and one daughter from those marriages. He died on October 7, 1941, in Seattle, Washington, at the age of 66, and was buried there.
 |
Arthur Schoennauer as a young man |
Biographical Sketch
My maternal grandfather, Arthur Schoennauer, was born in Chicago, Illinois, and was the fourth child born of his parents, and tragically was only one of two brothers out of eight children that survived childhood to have children of their own.
The 1800 census shows him at 4 years old living with his parents at 258 Mohawk Street in Chicago. Twenty years later, the 1900 census shows him at 24 years old living with his mother at 2734 Princeton Avenue in the Chicago Southtown area. The house they lived in appears to have had three apartments, and with the census showing the three resident families in the house, by the order of enumeration, it seems apparent that Arthur and his mother lived on the third floor.
 |
1880 census in Chicago, Cook Co, Illinois. This census show the Schoennauer family of five living together: Father, John, age 41, occupation as filemaker; mother, Amalia, age 40, keeping house; and children, Emiel, age 10, at school, Arthur, age 4, and Amanda, age 1. |
 |
1900 census in Chicago, Cook Co, Illinois |
 |
This is the Schoennauer home listed on the 1900 census: 2734 Princeton Ave., Chicago, Illinois, where Arthur was living with his mother, Amalia in 1900. |
 |
This entry in the 1900 Chicago City directory (page 1687) validates the residency information from the 1900 census above and shows Arthur's work at the time, an occupation he continued throughout his life. (Source URL: 1900s.pdf (chicagoancestors.org) |
Between the 1880 census and 1900 census, there is not much of an official record of Arthur or family events. Unfortunately, the 1890 census was burned in a massive fire inside the Commerce Department building in Washington, DC in 1921, destroying most of the that census. With a little bit of investigative work, I discovered that the 1890 Chicago City Directory shows the following two entries, one for Amalia, recently widowed from her second husband, Conrad Kratz, and another for her eldest son, Emil Schoennauer, who would have been 21 years old and employed as a printer. Her younger son, my grandfather, Arthur, still being only about 15 years old, would not have been listed. When compared together, they show the family's residence at 317 24th Street in Chicago. (The directory didn't indicate if it was "East 24th" or "West 24th," but neither location provides much helpful information for an historical connection when compared to current GoogleMap street view photos, as so much has changed on both streets over the past 130 years.)
 |
1890 Chicago City Directory. Page 1261 shows a listing for Kratz households. Amalia had married Conrad Kratz as her second husband in 1887 shortly after her divorce from John Schoennauer. Conrad died within a couple years following the marriage. |
 |
1890 Chicago City Directory, page 1957. Entry shows Arthur Schoennauer's older brother Emil, who was 21 years old in 1890, working as a printer. |
Other information from that time period that does exist shows a somewhat troubled family life. I learned quite a few years ago that my grandmother had been married four times, three after her marriage to John ended. When I presented that genealogical information to my mother (while she was still living), she attempted to explain that life for divorced and widowed women such as Amalia in the late 1800s, in her 50s by the time she divorced my mother's grandfather, John (1887), who had been suffering from the multiple wounds received from military service during the Civil War, would have been extremely difficult, especially in a large city like Chicago. Her number one priority would have been the care, support and security of her family, and in those times, support primarily came from men. In many instances, especially in poorer families, the aspect of "love" in selecting a husband in a subsequent marriage would take a back seat to those other factors as reasons for marriage. Unfortunately, it seems, my grandfather's mother did not make wise decisions when it came to selecting men for those subsequent marriages. (I will go into more detail when I create the blog page for her.)
Chicago had done a great job of recovering from what is known as The Great Chicago Fire of October, 1871, a devastating conflagration that destroyed thousands of buildings and killed over 300 people. After the fire, Chicago’s population had grown rapidly, but during the 1890s, the growth had led to overcrowding and poor living conditions for many residents. The city’s infrastructure had undergone significant changes to accommodate its growth, including the adoption of electric traction, which replaced horse and cable cars with electric streetcars, and the first lines of the elevated railway system also opened during this time.
There's always a negative side to fast growth. What my mother had told me resonated with me, and it immediately brought to mind the semester in high school where we read, studied and analyzed the Upton Sinclair book, "The Jungle." It may be familiar to many, but if not, I'll review it briefly. With its plot centered around a 1900-era Chicago backdrop, the book depicts working-class poverty, lack of an adequate social supports, the harsh and unpleasant living and working conditions there, and the hopelessness among many workers and people living in Chicago (as a metaphor for the whole United States). While Sinclair's primary motive was to advance socialism in the U.S., he accurately portrayed the harsh working conditions in Chicago's meat processing industry of the early 1900s and described the deeply rooted corruption of factory owners and people in power. The most notable impact of the novel at the time was the public outcry over health violations and unsanitary practices in the American meat-packing industry during the early 20th century, which led to sanitation reforms, including more stringent laws around the industry. So the working-class environment the book described in Chicago is how I visualized the life my great-grandparents faced with their lives there, made much worse after they divorced and he died only a couple years later. And my grandfather, Arthur, was in the middle of it.
The two newspaper articles below, reporting on the same event from 1896, show how dysfunctional the small Schoennauer family had become, and the life my grandfather found himself in as a young man. He was 21 years old at this time.
 |
One of two newspaper articles about the family quarrel that ended with step-father being shot. This article was reported in the "Omaha World-Herald" (Omaha, Nebraska), September 21, 1896, Page 1. |
TELEGRAPH BRIEFS
V.A Prelick quarreled with his stepson, Arthur Schoenauer, at Chicago, and the latter fired at him, the bullet taking effect in his leg.
 |
Second newspaper article about the quarrel and subsequent shooting. This article was reported in "The Inter Ocean" (Chicago, Illinois), September 20, 1896, Page 17. |
SHOT BY HIS STEPSON.
A Family Quarrel Results in a Bullet for V. A. Prelick.
V. A. Prelick, 50 years old, of No. 2734 Portland avenue, is at the county hospital suffering from a bullet wound in his right leg, and Arthur Schoenauer. his stepson, is locked up at the Twenty-Second street police station on a charge of assault with intent to kill. Early yesterday morning the men quarreled over family matters, it is said, and Schoenauer drew a revolver and fired three shots. One of the bullets struck Prelick in the right leg, inflicting a painful but not dangerous wound. The quarreling, it is said, was caused by Prelick's refusal to work and his repeated efforts to have Schoenauer support the family.
It seems to me no one escapes responsibility for this tragedy: Arthur, who was now an adult, should have been willing to share the responsibility, while living in his mother's home, of contributing to the support of the family, and more seriously, who as a young man faced this conflict with his step-father by using a pistol to settle the argument, with the potential result and life-altering ramification of a murder charge had one of the bullets he fired killed him. You can be sure that this personality trait did not develop to this level of anger overnight. Arthur fired three shots at his step-father, so as the second newspaper article correctly shows relating to the police charge, this was more than a warning. He had intended to kill him. Mr. Perlick, who at 50 years old, was probably fully capable of working a fulltime job, but expected his stepson, at 21 years old, to support the family while he refused to work; and Amalia, with the primary focus, it would seem, to select a man capable of and willing to financially support her and the family, and as it turned out, her absolute failure to do so, in all three subsequent marriages.
First Marriage
In 1902, at 27 years old, Arthur met and married a young woman from Tipton, Tipton County, Indiana, named Fanny Sells, who was 23 years old. She came from a farming family. There is no indication of where they met or how long they knew each other prior to deciding to marry. They received their marriage license on 22 September 1902 and were married the following day, on 23 September 1902 by R. H. Boyd.
 |
Marriage license for Arthur Schoennauer and Fanny Sells issued on 22 Sep 1902. They married the following day. (Source: "Indiana Marriages, 1811-2007," database with images, FamilySearch (21 January 2016), Tipton > 1902-1905 Volume 10 > image 67 of 217; Indiana Commission on Public Records, Indianapolis.) |
 |
Indiana marriage record for Arthur Schoennauer and Fannie Sells, 23 September 1902. (Source: Indiana Marriages, 1811-2007, Tipton 1900-1903> image 77 of 99; Indiana Commission on Public Records, Indianapolis.) |
It's unclear if Arthur remained living with Fanny in the Tipton, Indiana area for a while or if he returned to Chicago with Fanny to live with his mother. But on 6 July 1903, slightly under nine months after their marriage ceremony, a son was born to them in Chicago, Illinois. They named him Arthur Paul Schoennauer. Together they lived in Chicago until 17 December 1906, at which time Arthur Sr. moved to Seattle, and Fanny and their son remained in Chicago. I believe my grandfather went to Seattle to visit his older brother Emil, who had moved from Chicago to Snohomish, Washington (a town about 30 miles north of downtown Seattle) between August 1899 and May 1900. Arthur's trip may have been intended as a short visit with his brother, or as an employment opportunity, as both were employed as printers. But Arthur never returned to Chicago! Details that came out a few years later show there may have been two sides to this story, as there always are.
A year and a half later, on 30 January 1908, Arthur commenced an action for a divorce in Snohomish county, Washington. In court documents initiated by Fanny (as plantiff) three years later in 1911 (appealing for child support), service for the divorce action from Arthur in 1908 had been made by publication. Because no answer had been forthcoming, the superior court of that county declared that the wife (Fanny) defaulted, and on 20 April 1908, a decree of divorce was granted on the ground of abandonment (by the wife). Arthur claimed that after he had come to the state of Washington, he had repeatedly asked Fanny to join him, and that he provided her with means for doing so, but that she refused every invitation. Fanny alleged in her suit that she did not abandon him, but rather that he had abandoned her; that she had no actual knowledge of the divorce action until long after the final decree had been entered. Arthur had remarried in the meantime, and for that reason she refrained from attacking the validity of the decree of divorce.
To make it even more complicated, Arthur offered to show the court that, about three years after their marriage, Fanny had instituted an action for divorce in the courts of Illinois; that her action was prosecuted to a final judgment for separate maintenance, which judgment also awarded her custody of the child, and alimony payable monthly; that shortly thereafter, learning that he had sold his real estate and was about to leave for Seattle, she caused his arrest; that, by reason of his persuasion, they then resumed their relations as husband and wife; that, immediately thereafter, he, without warning, abandoned her and came to Seattle; that she wrote him repeatedly during the succeeding year; that he sent her railroad transportation to bring her to Seattle, but that she was too ill to travel; that her illness continued for several months; that she wrote him advising him that she would come to Seattle as soon as she was able to undertake the journey; that she did not hear from him thereafter; that she wrote him repeatedly; and that she had no knowledge of the divorce proceedings until after the entry of the decree.
The court ruled that, regardless of whether Arthur abandoned his wife, or that she abandoned him, the rights of their child would not be affected, nor would Arthur be relieved of the duties or obligations imposed upon him to contribute to its support. The court found that Arthur had made no reference to the child in his divorce complaint, and the court found it to be "a well established rule of law, and, we think, uncontradicted, that the maintenance of children is a matter which the court can adjudicate at different times during the minority of the child." The judgment for child support was affirmed.[1]
 |
Schoennauer v. Schoennauer Appeal Case (1913) |
Their son, Paul Schoennauer, grew up with his mother in Cicero Township, Tipton County, Indiana. The 1910 census for Indiana shows Paul, age 6, living with his mother, Fanny, age 29, and grandparents, Benjamin H. Sells, age 81 and Catharine, age 60.
 |
1910 Census, Indiana, Tipton County, Cicero Township, sheet 5A |
On 27 January 1920, the census record shows Paul (identified with his full birth name, Arthur Paul Schoennauer), was 16 years old and living with his mother, Fanny, shown as 37 years old, still on her parent's farm in Cicero Township, Tipton County, Indiana.
 |
1920 Census, Indiana, Tipton County, Cicero Township, sheets 2A/B. |
These are two photo of Arthur Paul Schoennauer taken while attending high school.  |
Arthur Paul Schoennauer (age 16) |
 |
This Tipton High School 1920 yearbook extract shows Paul among a group of other students. He is in the top photo, first row, furthest on the right. |
In January 1923, Paul enlisted into the Army. His first duty assignment after training was to Ohau, Hawaii, where he arrived on 18 March 1923 and served as Motor Transport Operator and Mechanic in Battery B of the 8th Field Artillery Division at Schofield Barracks. Sometime after April 14, 1923 (that was the date of the last letter he wrote to his mother in Indiana telling her how happy he was stationed in Hawaii and that he was in splendid health), he suffered with Peritonitis, and he died from complications of the condition on April 29th. He was shipped home to his mother and a military funeral was conducted at Fairview Cemetery in Tipton, Indiana.
I have not found anything to show whether or not my grandfather knew of his son's passing. It seems clear by the newspaper accounts of his death and funeral that Arthur was not present for the funeral or burial ceremonies.
After her son's death, she moved to Kokomo, Indiana, and at some point (date unknown) married a Mr. Raymond, according to the following 1956 newspaper report and her obituary.
 |
Newspaper article on police report showing Fanny had been "fleeced" by two confidence women in Kokomo, Indiana, losing almost $2,000 by the scam. (Source: "The Call-Leader" (Elwood, Indiana), June 28, 1956, Page 1) |
Late in life Fanny resided at the Methodist home in Warren. She passed away on 6 November 1961 in Warren, Huntington Co, Indiana. Funeral services were conducted at the Long Funeral home in Kokomo, with Rev. Sayre officiating. Interment was in the mausoleum at Tipton, Indiana.
 |
Obituary for Fanny (Sells) Raymond. She died at age 82. (Source: The Tipton Daily Tribune (Tipton, Indiana), November 21, 1961, Page 6) |
Second Marriage:
While Arthur was in Snohomish, Washington visiting his older brother, Emil, he met a young woman named Olive Colman. They married on 17 April 1909 in Spokane, Washington. Arthur is shown as 33 years old and Olive is 25. They were married by a Lutheran minister, Rev. Geo. F. Pauschart, pastor of St. Mark's Eng. Lutheran Church on the corner of Walton & Adams streets in Spokane.
 |
Marriage Certificate dated 17 April 1909 |
Olive was born on 24 February 1883 in Canal Winchester, Franklin, Ohio to John and Sarah Colman. I have found very little information other than that included on the marriage license relating to Olive Colman. She is listed with her parents and siblings on the 1900 census in Canal Winchester village, Madison township, Franklin county, Ohio.
 |
Colman family shown on the 1900 census in Franklin Co, Ohio. Olive ("Ollie") is the youngest. |
Arthur and Olive Schoennauer are shown on the 1910 census living at his house at 2130 North 51st Street, where he would live the rest of his life.
 |
Arthur & Olive on the 1910 census in Seattle, King county, Washington. If the census enumeration is complete for the block, there may have been only these three houses on the block at that time. |
Arthur and Olive divorced only a few years later. An official record of the divorce has not yet been located.The next record I found for her was a marriage certificate in Vancouver, B.C., Canada, and marriage to Clarence Jerome Johnson, age 40, a widower, scaler as occupation, and son of Peter & Annie Johnson. On the marriage license, Olive is shown at age 33, housekeeper as occupation. The marriage ceremony was on 3 July 1917 at St. Andrew's Church in Vancouver, B.C.
 |
Marriage Certificate for Olive Schoennauer and Clarence Johnson dated 3 July 1917. |
Olive's new husband, Clarence Johnson, died less than four years later, at 45 years old, in Redmond, Washington. Further information on Olive is not known at this time.
Third Marriage:
On 20 February 1915, a splendid walled city of domed palaces, palm-lined courts, and monumental statuary arose on San Francisco, California’s northern shore. Popularly known as the 1915 World's Fair—formally named the "Panama-Pacific International Exposition (PPIE)," commemorating the opening of the Panama Canal just nine years after San Francisco's devastating earthquake and fires of 1906—it emerged on 635 acres of land previously submerged by water.
The fair featured eleven exhibition palaces showcasing objects from every corner of the globe, more than 1,500 sculptures commissioned from artists all over the world, 65 acres of amusement concessions, and an aviation field. Fifty California counties, forty-eight states, and twenty-one countries mounted displays in the exposition’s grand pavilions. Then, after the fair closed, this ephemeral city was all but erased from the landscape. In the intervening ten months, nearly nineteen million people—about twenty times the population of San Francisco at the time—were drawn to the spectacle.
Two of those people drawn to visit San Francisco's World's Fair were Arthur Schoennauer, and a young woman destined to be my grandmother, Ida Amalia Welk, a woman of German origins who had immigrated with her family to the U.S. in 1908. Although my grandmother shared very little with me about my grandfather, she did tell me about their meeting there. After that introduction (not sure how long the trip to San Francisco lasted), they both returned home, her to Portland, Oregon and he to Seattle, Washington, and began a correspondence exchange for a couple years, and I would presume visits by train to see each other.
As their relationship grew stronger over the next couple years, they were engaged and then married on 20 August 1918 in Portland, Oregon with Ida's full family present.
 |
Marriage Record for Arthur Schoennauer and Ida Welk in Portland, Oregon. (Source: Oregon State Archives. Oregon, Marriage Records, 1906-1910, 1946-1971. Salem, Oregon. Oregon Center For Health Statistics; Portland, Oregon, USA; Oregon State Marriages, 1911-1945) |
 |
Portland, Oregon newspaper notice of marriage license (Source: The Oregon Daily Journal, 21 Aug 1918, Page 10) |
 |
Wedding photo of Arthur Schoennauer and Ida Welk (1918) |
After they married, they made their home together at 2130 North 51st Street in Seattle, Washington, where they both lived the remainder of their lives.
The following month, in September 1918, Arthur registered for the draft. The Draft Registration Card below is a genealogical valuable document for multiple reasons. It shows his age and birthdate as 43 years old and born on October 5, 1875; it identifies him as being white by race and of native born citizenship; shows his occupation as a Linotype Operator at the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, one of the two large mainstream daily newspapers in Seattle located at 4th and Union streets; identifies his nearest relative as his new bride, Mrs. Ida Amalia Welk and their address as 2130 North 51st Street in Seattle; shows his personally identifiable characteristics as observed and recorded by the Draft Registrar: medium height, stout build, blue eyes, brown hair, and "little finger on right hand crooked" as a descriptive and identifiable disfiguration; and has his own full-name signature written by him.
 |
WWI Draft Registration Card for Arthur C. J. Schoennauer filed 12 September 1918. |
On 2 January 1920, the Schoennauer household was enumerated for the decennial census, and it showed both Arthur and Ida residing at 2130 N. 51st Street in Seattle. Had the enumerator visited their house two weeks later, it would have had another name added to the household, that of my mother. My grandmother must have been 8-1/2 months pregnant at the time. The census showed that Arthur was 44 years old and Ida was 35. It also showed she had immigrated in 1908 and her citizenship as "Naturalized," with the application probably not yet approved or finalized because of a year lacking in column 15.
 |
1920 census for Washington, King county, Seattle, sheet 1B, identifying neighboring residences along North 51st Street, showing a few more houses built since the census ten years earlier. |
Three children were born of this union within the following four years:1. Irmgard Ida Ottilie Schoennauer was born 15 January 1920
2. Arthur Henry August Schoennauer was born 26 October 1921
3. Alfred Walter William Schoennauer was born 3 September 1923
On 17 April 1930, the family appeared on the U.S. census for the state of Washington, residing at 2130 North 51st Street. Arthur is shown as 54 years old, Ida as 46, and children, Irma, age 10, Arthur, 8, and Alfred. 6. Arthur's occupation is shown as "Printer" in the newspaper industry.
 |
1930 Census for Washington, King county, Seattle, block no. 95 (sheet 40B) |
On 9 April 1940, the Schoennauer family was recorded on the decennial census, still residing at 2130 N. 51st St. in Seattle. Arthur, as head of family, is now 64 years old, Ida, 55, and children, Irmgard, 20, Arthur Jr., 17, and Alfred, 16. Arthur continues to work as Linotype Operator in the newspaper industry, having worked 42 weeks the previous year and earned $1,900 during that period.
 |
1940 Census for Washington state, King county, Seattle city, block no. 48 (sheet 6B) |
On 7 October 1941, he died quietly in his sleep at home, two days after his 66th birthday. The death certificate reports his cause of death was "acute dilation of the heart" due to coronary sclerosis due to obesity. An autopsy was done by the coroner and the findings were listed as the same. Johnson & Sons handled the funeral arrangements, and Arthur was buried at Lakeview Cemetery on 10 October 1941.
 |
Washington State Certificate of Death for Arthur C.J. Schoennauer, who died 7 October 1941. |
 |
Arthur C.J. Schoennauer gravesite. This was the second headstone here, added after my mother, Irma's death in 2003. The first smaller, in-ground headstone for Arthur was given to me by the Lake View Cemetery caretaker after this new one was added. |
Closing:
When I was a child visiting my grandmother and uncle at their house in Seattle, I was always "greeted" by my grandfather, in a manner of speaking, on every visit, because his large black and white framed portrait looked over me as I entered the house in the foyer entryway. His expression was one of grandfatherly love and a subdued pride in his accomplishments. He seemed to me to be a peaceful man who had a self-assured demeanor about him. Sometime shortly prior to the Irma's birth in 1920, Arthur had purchased an early Brownie-type camera to photograph memories of the family, and the results showed him to be a loving and proud father and earnest provider through years of family photographs. I looked through the dozen or so handmade binders of photos multiple times growing up.
There was no sign in that calm portrait of him in the entryway or in the spontaneously photographed images of him and the children, my mother and my two uncles, in the photo binders, showing any hints of the somewhat bizarre events of his earlier life, most of which I would learn much later about him: the young boy who lost his father, by divorce when he was 12, and by death when he was 14, who had been suffering from the wounds and injuries received in a cruel civil war which pit cousin against cousin; or the teenager who saw his mother turn strangers into step-fathers, one right after another; or the young man who would shoot one of his step-fathers in anger over an argument about money, employment, and the responsibility for providing for the family; or the adult who abandoned his first wife and child on the other side of the United States; or the philanderer that manipulated the court to file a one-sided divorce from his first wife so he could legally marry his second; or the smooth playboy who wooed a woman who would be his third wife, quite possibly before the second marriage had even ended, and then once married, moved her into the house he had built or bought new for the second wife.
Those personalities traits are from two distinctively different people. Was I the only one fooled or not seeing the full picture of his life? How much of his former life was shared with his third wife, my grandmother? Were my mother and her two brothers even ever aware they had an older brother from their father's first marriage, a young man who died while serving his country while they were still infants? Or was I the first to make the connection between this apparent doppelganger named Arthur Schoennauer?
By looking at some of the highlights I've found on his life, the primary catalyst or point of transformation in his life seems to be the day he married Ida Welk, the woman destined to be my grandmother. At that point, the uncommitted drifter seemed to be transformed into a faithful, settled husband and family man. My next blog essay will be centered on my grandmother, a strong, Godly woman I so respected when I was a child and young adult. I'm sure that she must have been the transforming force in Arthur's life at 42-43 years old. Thank God he found her!
Despite my settling on an answer for analyzing the most likely breakthrough moment for turning my grandfather's life around, so many questions remain unanswered for me from this walk down Memory Lane on my grandfather's life.
Endnotes:
[1] Legal case: SCHOENNAUER v. SCHOENNAUER. Opinion Per CROW, C.J. 77 Wash. [No. 10892. Department Two, December 29, 1913.] FANNY SCHOENNAUER, Respondent, v. ARTHUR C.J. SCHOENNAUER, Appellant. Original Source: Washington Reports Volume 77: Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Washingnton, By Washington (State). Supreme Court, Eugene G. Kreider, Arthur Remington, William Henry Anders 1914; pages 132-138, 773 (https://books.google.com/books?id=3WotAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA132). Online Repository: Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington (MRSC); Schoennauer v. Schoennauer, 77 Wash. 132, 137 Pac. 325 (1913); Pages 132-138;(http://courts.mrsc.org/washreports/077WashReport/077WashReport0132.htm), accessed 6 Sep 2023
This is part of my "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" blog challenge.